Also, Field Theories in Word:http://rbduncan.com/fieldtheory.doc
& Field Theories in Adobe pdf:http://rbduncan.com/fieldtheory.pdfFitzpatrick's 1966 book showed the relative motion laws of A. Ampère unified the forces.
This was the way the site --below-- looked many years ago. - - Dan Fitz.
Einstein's Most Important Discovery
. . . .shows why . . . .
Thisappears to be a Dystopian Universe
Einstein's most important discovery was not E=mc2 or relativity. It was what he discovered even later!
In 1954, about a year before he died, Einstein wrote, "I consider it quite possible that physics cannot be based on the field concept, i.e., on continuous structures. In that case, nothing remains of my entire castle in the air, gravitation theory included, [and of] the rest of modern physics."
Einstein, back then, was telling us that this whole concept of fields, while being of immense importance if held within strict and narrow parameters, was probably absolutely worthless when trying to figure out this entire universe.
What is so amazing is that almost no one listened to what Einstein said back then in 1954.
Scientists are still using the field concept today to try to figure out what really is going on in this universe of ours over 50 years after Einstein emphatically told them it most probably cannot be done.
As Einstein discovered when we use field concepts, we cannot see our universe as asimple utopian universe. We see it instead as a universe we cannot understand. We see it as a Dystopian Universe.
Not only have scientists wasted their time with the field concept - trying to unify these fields - but they have spent hundreds of millions, perhaps even billions, of dollars doing so.
What is crystal clear now, in this day and age, is that both space and these invisible forces come about because of the spin frequencies of these Spinning, Scalar, Standing Wave, Resonances that nature uses to build our entire universe.
These SSSWRs were discovered, and mathematically proven, byDr. Milo Wolff .
It is not the field concept by which you can see this but it can be clearly seen by using the Laws Ampere gave us in the early 1800s.
Faraday gave us the field concept which we use now but to see whst is really going on, in this entire universe as the parameters widen, we must use Ampere's relative motion laws that predict exactly how SSSWRs behave.
My estimate is that only a few thousand people on earth see this today. Ampere's Laws
And I would say that the people who know exactly why Ampere's Laws work are even fewer in number.
To understand this read my entire 192 page e-book FREE. Click link --> Universities Asleep at the Switch
And another very important thing that these universities entirely missed:
Einstein put words to something Newton understood: It's called Theprinciple of equivalence. You cannot discern gravity from an acceleration.
In other words: if you are weightless in a spaceship far from earth and that spaceship begins to accelerate at a speed of 32 feet per second, per second then you would not be able to discern this acceleration force from the force of gravity.
But for us back here on earth is this acceleration really here?
The answer is no. The gravitational force we feel is here but the acceleration itself is not really here but we do discern it as an acceleration.
Well, then what about this newly discovered acceleration that Saul Perlmutter's group recently discovered.
Saul Perlmutter, himself, stated that we now have Einstein's cosmological constant operating in this universe.
But few listened to that statement just as few listened to Einstein's statement in 1954.
Einstein, himself, said his cosmological constant was a force equal but opposite to gravity holding all the stars and galaxies apart.
So if there is no actual acceleration via the force of gravity then how can there be any actual acceleration with gravity's equal and opposite force (cosmological constant)?
If the Newton-Einsteinprinciple of equivalence is valid for one (gravity), then it must also be valid for the other (cosmological constant).
Therefore what this essentially means, boys and girls, is that we must have no actual accelerating, expanding universe but we must really be in a steady state universe exactly as that noted British astronomer Fred Hoyle claimed we had, all of his entire life.
As theprinciple of equivalence states: we can discern the acceleration but it is not really there.
It's the force itself - that is there - that we are discerning (cosmological constant) and this actual equal and opposite force to gravity we most definitely can discern as the acceleration that Perlmutter's group discovered.
You can peruse all about this at:Click links--> http://www.rbduncan.com/ and at my web page http://www.amperefitz.com .
Thanks for taking time to read this,
Daniel P. Fitzpatrick Jr.