SEE, — HOW the complexities of
FIELD THEORIES HID from us, the fact that relative motion (phase) between all these spinning entities, in the micro & macro universe, gives us all the attractive and repulsive Fundamental Forces.
Oct-29-2018.
Field Theories in html: http://rbduncan.com/fieldtheory.html

Also, Field Theories in Word: http://rbduncan.com/fieldtheory.doc

& Field Theories in Adobe pdf: http://rbduncan.com/fieldtheory.pdf

Fitzpatrick's 1966 book showed the relative motion laws of A. Ampère unified the forces.
Fitz's first book in 1966

Fitz's 1966 book in PDF


EVERYTHING on these links herein are FREE, & NO pop up ads with these either.


This was the way the site --below-- looked many years ago. - - Dan Fitz.



Caroline mentioned Bell's Inequality.

Bell's Inequality and EPR (Einstein, Podolsky, Rosen) both show not that quantum mechanics is wrong but that it is incomplete. There are some missing ingredients

Take angular momentum for instance. We know that the angular momentum of a spinning object depends not only on the frequency of the number of rotations that it makes but also on the mass of the object. But quantum mechanics forgets mass entirely and simply equates angular momentum with frequency alone.

Quantum theory has too many of these missing ingredients.

Yet it tells us that the spin of an electron is quite different from the spin of the earth.

I guess this would SEEM true when you are not using all of the ingredients.

Once you realize that the electron gets its intrinsic inertial mass from surrounding electrons, the same as our mass is derived from our surroundings (Mach's principle), and then you also give the electron gyro torque; guess what happens?

You can derive all of the electrical laws simply from this gyro torque.

I saw and published this in 1966.

So you are never going to completely understand the electron, or for that matter anything else, via a theory with missing ingredients.

Every theoretical physicist is going to tell you the spin of the electron is different from the spin of a top even though their own science negates the necessary ingredients to make the spin similar.

So I consider the electron - if it could be viewed in its own reference frame - as being a spherical particle with gyro torque.

Viewed from our realm, however, it can be viewed as a spherical standing wave or even as Gabriel's plum pudding.

It depends on the resonance - oscillator frequency - of the viewer.

 

z