Oct-29-2018.

Also, **Field Theories** in Word: *http://rbduncan.com/fieldtheory.doc*

& **Field Theories** in Adobe pdf: *http://rbduncan.com/fieldtheory.pdf*

This was the way the site --below-- looked many years ago. - - Dan Fitz.

Click ANY of these links to get what you want.

For the very latest in science, click links below:

*c.squared.html 11-25-2017**c.squared.pdf 11-25-2017* (Adobe)*c.squared.doc 11-25-2017* (Word)

This universe could be much simpler than anyone has even imagined.

Using a single reference frame, we may be improperly visualizing these other reference frames (*gauges*)

What if the space-time interval is different in these different gauges?

Is this why we are forced to design different rules for different gauges?

It looks like this universe uses one universal law for the microcosm and the macrocosm.

Let's look at Milo Wolff's WSM (Wave Structure of Matter)

More and more evidence is pouring in telling us that Fulbright Scholar, theoretical physicist Milo Wolff's WSM is correct. All particles, whatever their size, are spherical standing wave resonances.

Now that the preponderance of scientists agree WSM is correct then we have to come to the conclusion that any universal law will have to be proven using a type of frequency math similar to Milo Wolff's.

Proof obtained with any other math, than a type of frequency math, must only be proof of a gauge rule. If this is a frequency universe, how can regular non frequency math prove a universal law?

We are also drawn to the conclusion that this inertia, we experience, is a complicated WSM reaction.

Our inertia, along with our space-time, must only occur within the parameters of a certain - yet unknown - frequency band.

Therefore we will wait for future computers to resolve inertia. But knowing inertia is WSM related, then we also know inertia will be frequency related..

AND

This is important, it may be a common "inertial law", not only used for us here, but also used in __every__ __frequency__ __band__ (*gauge*). But we fail to see this because our space-time is not the same as the space-time in these other gauges,. We simply do not recognize this universal "inertial law" because in our space-time realm (*gauge*) the various other space-time realms (*gauges*) have to appear differently.

So if WSM is correct, and the evidence seems to be overwhelming now that it is, we have established that our inertia must be a gauge rule at our particular frequency (some yet undiscovered frequency band).

But some type of inertial qualities must exist at other frequency bands (*gauges*) as well.

OK

We'll get into the difference between what we see as spin and the electron spin later.

For now, lets combine what we've learned so far with what Ampere told us about electrons going the same direction on parallel paths attracting and ones going on parallel paths in opposite directions repelling.

Then we also see Ampere gave us a good description of magnetism caused by electrons "locked" spin up or spin down on orbitals.

These "locked" electrons will attract when their closest sides are going the same direction and they will repel when their closest sides are going in opposite directions. The reason a polar attraction is stronger than a side attraction is that in a polar attraction the entire portions of the two electrons are going in the same direction.

Now combine what Einstein said about this force called gravity being __not__ a force, as Newton claimed, but a distortion of space-time.

Let's say Einstein was right and all forces are nothing but space-time creations.

Now we have Ampere telling us how space-time (these forces) are all created and this is a WSM frequency related __universal__ __law__ and not some gauge rule.

The word "object" (below) will mean __any__ WSM spherical standing wave resonance.

Daniel P. Fitzpatrick Jr

*Over 4 Decades of Daniel P. Fitzpatrick's Books, Papers and Thoughts*

Over 4 Decades of Fitzpatrick's Books, Papers & Thoughts http://www.amperefitz.com/4.decades.htm