...

...

...

...

Last, but not least, we solve even __ more__ of Niels Bohr's Complementarity Problem, because we see how an electron,

Precession, with each revolution — **over a long period of time** — results in a perfectly round PARTICLE or Dr. Milo Wolff's spinning, SCALAR, standing wave.

Therefore, a **tremendously longer period of TIME (**

We only know the binding speed of two of these: electrons bind together at the speed of light, and quarks bind together at, *or more than*, 20 billion times the speed of light (2x10^{10c}). *vanFlandern*

All of these spinning entities, in our universe seek stability. Perfect stability would be achieved when the binding energy to the surroundings equaled the binding energy inside the spinning entity (PARTICLE) itself.

Future super-computers will prove, beyond a shadow of a doubt, that stability is achieved in these different space/motion ratios (gauges) when —* a similar balancing entity *— exists between ** all** these spinning entities from quarks to super clusters,

Today, this ** balancing method, in the SPACE between these different gauges — IS THE ONLY THING — that IS quantified **(throughout our entire universe)

"Gauge invariance" can only mean ONE THING: area that has the SAME space/time (space/motion) RATIO.

Relativity, *or relationship*, of spin frequencies becomes of supreme importance.

Now — * between the spacetime realms of the electron and stars* — we insert another

This is correct, and as Stephen Wolfram has warned us — * we need a MODEL for this BEFORE WE DO ANY MATH* — yet modern physics has established itself as a true religion when it is only a mixture of mathematical rules that seem to work OK in our particular subset space/time gauge. A few of us have now given you the foundation stones for the correct BALANCED spin-orbit MODEL that really works all throughout this universe. Stay on this track.

We wouldn't even be here if this universe was __perfectly__ balanced: fission and fusion energy results from our microcosm seeking better stability via **IMPROVED BALANCING** by converting both larger and smaller elements into iron or elements closer to iron.

Atomic power stems from a *drastic* space/time RATIO change: here's the best non-mathematical explanation.

If the term "gauge" refers to a specific space/motion ratio, then the hydrogen bomb is stronger than the old atomic fission bomb because the gauge change to our gauge is more severe: the uranium or heavier element electrons involved are going far slower around the nucleus — *closer to our gauge* — than the inner hydrogen electrons.

Now you have some TRUE facts and the **WHY** for the Big Bang.

Thanks for reading this.

If any of your work seems to correlate to my findings then please write to me at:

Daniel P. Fitzpatrick Apt. 329

Belmont Village

4310 Bee Cave Road

West Lake Hills, TX 78746

Send me your e-mail.

THIS full PAGE in htm: - *http://rbduncan.com/EinsteinsUnFld.htm*

Also, THIS full PAGE in Word: - *http://rbduncan.com/EinsteinsUnFld.doc*

And THIS full PAGE in Adobe pdf: - *http://rbduncan.com/EinsteinsUnFld.pdf*